Week 13: IMA Step 6: Evaluation in HP practice & course integration
|
Preparation for Week #13
|
1. Compare/contrast the role of evaluation in your proposed “ideal” response to your chosen issue with the way evaluation was actually employed (or not) in your chosen community-based response/intervention
2. Explore:
|
|
Class Topics
|
1. Types and purposes of evaluation
2. Roles of evaluation in health promotion
3. Challenges to evaluation in health promotion
4. Contributions of community based participatory research to health promotion practice
5. Evaluation competencies required/expected of health promotion practitioners
|
|
Required readings from course textbooks
|
1. Bartholomew et al. (2011): Chapter 9
2. Glanz et al. (2008): Chapter 21
|
|
Additional required reading
|
2. Leviton, L. C., Khan, L. K., Rog, D., Dawkins, N., & Cotton, D. (2010). Evaluability Assessment to Improve Public Health Policies, Programs, and Practices. Annual Review of Public Health, 31(1), 213-233. http://www.annualreviews.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103625
6. (N) Sridharan, S., Go, S., Zinzow, H., Gray, A., & Gutierrez Barrett, M. (2007). Analysis of strategic plans to assess planning for sustainability of comprehensive community initiatives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(1), 105-113. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/resolve/01497189/v34i0002/135_tstmem
|
|
Recommended readings re. evaluation in health promotion practice
|
Re. Evaluation In Health Promotion Practice
General discussion
4. Vijgen, S. M. C., van Baal, P. H. M., Hoogenveen, R. T., de Wit, G. A., & Feenstra, T. L. (2008). Cost-effectiveness analyses of health promotion programs: a case study of smoking prevention and cessation among Dutch students. Health Educ. Res., 23(2), 310-318. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/resolve/02681153/v23i0002/310_caohpppacads&form=pdf&file=file.pdf
Examples of frameworks
|
|
Recommended readings re. community based participatory research
|
2. Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Levesque, L., Horn-Miller, K., McComber, A., & Macaulay, A. C. (2008). Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. Health Educ. Res., 23(5), 904-914. http://her.oxfordjournals.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/cgi/reprint/23/5/904
4. Flicker, S., Maley, O., Ridgley, A., Biscope, S., Lombardo, C., & Skinner, H. A. (2008). e-PAR: Using technology and participatory action research to engage youth in health promotion. Action Research, 6(3), 285-303. http://arj.sagepub.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/cgi/reprint/6/3/285
9. Scarinci, I. C., Johnson, R. E., Hardy, C., Marron, J., & Partridge, E. E. (2009). Planning and implementation of a participatory evaluation strategy: A viable approach in the evaluation of community-based participatory programs addressing cancer disparities. Evaluation and program planning, 32(3), 221-228. http://resolver.scholarsportal.info.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/resolve/01497189/v32i0003/221_paioapcppacd
|
|